RE: [SCBuzz] BJ, question cont
Eileen,
You have credentials. You have an understanding of HOAs. You are a threat. The Bjonerud Chat line can’t deal with the truth. Don, Robey and YOU. We have studied the problem. Passmonic and Silver they bring up to many questions. Hell, I don’t know how many he has bounced. I guess Bob Hall has been banned also. I really don’t know. But, you will note that when the KING is threatened all telephone, wi-fi, internet, connections are cut buy the KING. Cut the communications. First rule of a dictator.
That is why we are having our Rally at 11:00 at the Sawyer Building. Perhaps you would like to join us. I don’t predict it to be a flop. We are even going to have it advertised on TV and then the even might make the news also. Who knows.
http://hoaadvocate.homestead.com/HowToPhotos.html
BIG RALLY FEB. 7th @ 11 AM !
In front of Grant Sawyer Bldg
Corner of LV BLVD and Washington
(Across from Cashman Field)
ALL NEVADA HOMEOWNERS are Encouraged to Attend
Together - We can help change Nevada's NRS116 Laws
to make them more "HomeOwner-Friendly".You Must Be Kidding! In front of Grant Sawyer Bldg
Corner of LV BLVD and Washington
(Across from Cashman Field)
ALL NEVADA HOMEOWNERS are Encouraged to Attend
Together - We can help change Nevada's NRS116 Laws
This is just a reminder about the Ethics class that will be taught by Michael Schulman and me on 1-25-11 at 9:00 a.m. called Beyond the Basics of Ethics. I have attached the flier for your use and hope to see many of you there. This is a new class CE.001480000 CAM General Credits. RSVP with CAI at info@cai-nevada.org There are not many people signed up to date and (if it was me) with the FBI investigations going on with arrests in the wings, I would want to have an ethics class under my belt to show that I was trying to keep up to date with "issues" in Nevada.
http://www.hoasupport.com/nevadaupdate.htm%20
Dearest Eileen,
This is Robert PaisolaTo make my job simple,
�
WHAT????????
Eileen, ignore him.�And folks, do you see the "agenda" now?
This will be much easier than having ABC NEWS and Darcy talking to Millions of People on National Television. Eileen, ignore him.�And folks, do you see the "agenda" now?
You can save yourself a lot of time and serious embarrassment by assisting us to assist you.
This is�my last comment�about Robert Paisola. I am so DONE with him!
Re: [SCBuzz] "BUTT OUT of our business!!!!" (Re: Have you yet Realized Wrong You Were????)
BJ:
I will be happy to see you elected. Sounds as though you understand why
the Board can not continue on the same path.
Don
Mr. Schulman, recently I sent you a direct email, that email related to the letter I and no doubt every SCSCAI resident received from you. The topic of your letter was the Board meeting change here in SCSCAI from February 4 to February 7, a situation that has placed various residents in a poor position, they having changed their appointments to meet February 4th, now to find out the meeting is on the 7th, whereby it could have been made part of the next scheduled Board meeting of the 15th, and there would both have been no delay, with the meeting noticed already.
By the way in your letter you addressed the fine integrity of the ACTING Board President LeVasseur, and no doubt to assist in her re-election bid, clearly praised LeVasseur's fine work, including as I say her fine integrity.
My simple answer to all that is - - - ARE YOU NUTS - - - , and representing SCSCAI as legal counsel, is not an open invitation to try to propel a candidate into a position, that clearly she does not deserve. Your motivation to expel on her integrity obvious has its reasons, possibly no more then to keep her in a position she does not deserve as far as the residents she has hurt, but with yourself as legal counsel, LeVasseur staying on the Board possibly has gains for legal counsel - - -and I say possibly!
Now again the LeVasseur fine integrity that you discussed in your letter, and I'll make it easy to understand, so you can easily see how integrity is the last word to use in describing LeVasseur in a position she clearly has not earned:
* Her previous failed attempt with the Age Restriction issue!
* She and three others in their takeover of SCSCAI, by removing the then
President, and placing LeVasseur in the Presidency!
* The new LeVasseur policy of secrecy, it proven by copies of emails of which I
have received in which LeVasseur and Cullen, another Board member, have
been exchanging emails behind the backs of the residents, behind the backs of
the other Board members, and quite comical, but also behind the back of even
yourself, legal counsel! The question I have is how can legal counsel fairly
relate to an issue, if the Board President in writing refers to hiding data from
legal counsel?
* Oh by the way, agree with LeVasseur or you may be fired, this what happened
with the SCSCAI Human Resource Director - - - another comical but serious
move by the King Maker LeVasseur!
Now Michael, LeVasseur seems to have her hands full with both the delay and the possible decision for a replacement Executive Director. Need I say whose name has been mentioned to replace Winkel, another who you may as with LeVasseur, relate to having fine ethics. Mr. Schulman, ethics is one thing, but during his near
seven years with SCSCAI losing millions, never can ethics alone overcome what the SCSCAI seniors have gone through with such financial losses.
I'll close this followup to my first letter, and again hope to see a response, a response to the terrible facts we all in SCSCAI have to date faced with LeVasseur as President.
With deep respect,
(An 18 year SCSCAI resident, a 7 year past member of the SCSCAI Board, and a
35 year career in the HOA business.)
--- In mailto:SCBuzz%40yahoogroups.com, "Robert Paisola, CEO, MyCollector.com"
>
> I suggest a protest. I suggest that you file a million dollar lien against EACH of the board members as individuals. I suggest that you pool your money and file a claim against Schulmans Malpractice Bond. I suggest you all immediately cease to pay your HOA fees (I will provide you the letter ...
Robert Paisola, I am too upset to be polite, so I'm gonna say what I want to say, not as a representative of our community (yet) and not even as a candidate but as a very irritated unit owner: "BUTT OUT of our business!!!!"
You have no right to aggravate an already tense situation by suggesting protests, liens against each member of the Board, claims against the attorney's malpractice insurance, withholding our dues, etc. In my opinion (with no authority to make decisions for this chat line) what you are doing is NOT ok!
The information that I discovered on your blog via a Google search was of significant interest based on our current situation so I forwarded it to our Board of Directors for consideration. Whether this information turns out to be helpful in the Board's decision remains to be seen, but in my opinion your role in this matter (whatever it may have been) is over.
: )
Buzz owners, I understand and appreciate your willingness to not censor posts and even allow an outsider to join, but I believe Robert Paisola is way out of line. I also believe he is using this situation to advance his own personal agenda. Therefore, although it may go against everything you stand for, I hope you will remove Robert Paisola from this chat line or at least monitor his posts.
Sincerely,
BJ Martens
--- In mailto:SCBuzz%40yahoogroups.com, "Robert Paisola, CEO, MyCollector.com"
>
> I suggest a protest. I suggest that you file a million dollar lien against EACH of the board members as individuals. I suggest that you pool your money and file a claim against Schulmans Malpractice Bond. I suggest you all immediately cease to pay your HOA fees (I will provide you the letter- as you are "Disputing the Validity of the debt" (Nothing can be done) and visit http://www.naca.com/ to see how we do things... scroll down to the ABC news stories.....
>
> Problem Resolved. Be sure to file a blanket lien against EVERY BOARD MEMBER.
>
> Then we will tell America about Marilyn LeVasseur, Pat Cullen & Ellen Bachman in every detail. Hell, the governor will be involved. I may even call in Obama Favors.
>
> You want the truth.... Really?
Jan:
BJ is trying to make lemonade out of lemons so lets help her. The issue raised
about our selection of Christine will not go away. There is plenty of smoke and
Ican guarantee you there is a fire. I hope when all of this is fully disclosed
you and many of the other prior supporters of the Board(s) will see the light.
Marilyn didn't get here on her own. It will take a house cleaning by the
election to even start to get SCSCAI on a reasonable path.
I will stay in the fight but I am not sure any homeowner can be expected to jump
into the mud. Without a clear majority for Steinman vs. Marilyn (we have legal
actions going on) that mud is going to get all Directors very dirty.
Don Gelbman
| 639 | Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22   | Jan 31, 2011 10:40 pm | ||
| 640 | BobEmInc@... | Jan 31, 2011 11:06 pm | ||
| 641 | Robert Paisola, CEO, ... paisola | Jan 31, 2011 11:22 pm | ||
| 642 | BobEmInc@... | Jan 31, 2011 11:34 pm | ||
| 643 | BobEmInc@... | Jan 31, 2011 11:45 pm | ||
| 644 | Robert Paisola, CEO, ... paisola | Jan 31, 2011 11:58 pm | ||
| 645 | DONALD GELBMAN drgtrustpl | 12:09 am | ||
| 646 | drgtrustpl | 1:02 am | ||
| 647 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 4:11 am | ||
| 648 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 4:51 am | ||
| 649 | Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22 | 7:36 am | ||
| 650 | Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22 | 7:40 am | ||
| 651 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 7:47 am | ||
| 652 | Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22 | 7:55 am | ||
| 653 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 7:57 am | ||
| 654 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 7:58 am | ||
| 655 | Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22 | 8:39 am | ||
| 656 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 8:59 am | ||
| 657 | drgtrustpl | 10:17 am | ||
| 658 | bjmartens89134 | 11:48 am | ||
| 659 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 11:55 am | ||
| 660 | DONALD GELBMAN drgtrustpl | 12:25 pm | ||
| 661 | BJ Martens bjmartens89134 | 12:29 pm | ||
| 662 | Jan Edwards suncityjanedwards@... | 12:30 pm | ||
| 663 | drgtrustpl | 12:41 pm | ||
| 664 | Bob Robey robroy33 | 12:46 pm | ||
| 665 | bjmartens89134 | 12:57 pm | ||
| 666 | bjmartens89134 | 1:00 pm | ||
| 667 | BJ Martens bjmartens89134 | 1:28 pm | ||
| 668 |
66
| Re: BJ, question cont Then why is my name plastered on that web site as trying to scam the comunity? Â Eileen ... From: Bob Robey Re: BJ, question cont Robey: You can do more good at the Board Meeting. Don Gelbman --- In http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg, "Bob Robey" > > Eileen, > > You have credentials. You have an understanding of HOAs. You are a threat. > The Bjonerud Chat line can't deal with the truth. Don, Robey and YOU. We > have studied the problem. Passmonic and Silver they bring up to many > questions. Hell, I don't know how many he has bounced. I guess Bob Hall has > been banned also. I really don't know. But, you will note that when the > KING is threatened all telephone, wi-fi, internet, connections are cut buy > the KING. Cut the communications. First rule of a dictator. > > > > That is why we are having our Rally at 11:00 at the Sawyer Building. > Perhaps you would like to join us. I don't predict it to be a flop. We are > even going to have it advertised on TV and then the even might make the news > also. Who knows. > > > > Robey > > > > > > _____ > > From: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg [mailto:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg] On Behalf Of > Eileen Mckyton > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:55 PM > To: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg > Subject: RE: [SCBuzz] BJ, question cont > > > > > > > Then why is my name plastered on that web site as trying to scam the > comunity? > > > > Eileen > > --- On Tue, 2/1/11, Bob Robey > > > From: Bob Robey > Subject: RE: [SCBuzz] BJ, question cont > To: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg > Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 3:59 PM > > > > I can understand your not releasing the names. You are not the problem. > The problem is the Board. > > > > Bob Robey > > > > > > > _____ > > > From: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg [mailto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg ] On Behalf Of > Eileen Mckyton > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:39 AM > To: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg > Subject: Re: [SCBuzz] BJ, question cont > > > > > > > Could not get back to your last email so am answering on this one > > > > OOPS hit wrong button I meant 10 days.. Its early and my fingers hit the > wrong key > > > > The only reason I am up at this hour today is because of all this mess. I > dare not go to my doctor as she will put me on high blood pressure pills. > > > > As far as releasing the names of the candidates, I cannot. It is not my > decision it is the boards decision, although I see no reason to not release > the names of the 5 candidates. > > > > Eileen > > > > --- On Tue, 2/1/11, Bob Robey > > > From: Bob Robey > Subject: [SCBuzz] BJ, question cont > To: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCBuzz/post?postID=HmipULyJMMyTnDbscJCZQHoDFTIXb-7XYWHY331fBiBYZ2hvf9syiUNFFMkaRbwrGm_qK_-hVhoPEixPgFeFyg > Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 11:51 AM > > > > Dear BJ. > > > > Here is the way the 10 days are written in NRS 116. > > 2. Except in an emergency or unless the bylaws of an association > require a longer period of notice, the secretary or other officer specified > in the bylaws of the association shall, not less than 10 days before the > date of a meeting of the executive board, cause notice of the meeting to be > given to the units' owners. Such notice must be: > > > > Hereis how NRS 241 (The NV opening meeting law reads) > > > > NRS 241.020 > > 3. Minimum public notice is: > > (a) Posting a copy of the notice at the principal office of the public > body or, if there is no principal office, at the building in which the > meeting is to be held, and at not less than three other separate, prominent > places within the jurisdiction of the public body not later than 9 a.m. of > the third working day before the meeting; and > > (b) Providing a copy of the notice to any person who has requested > notice of the meetings of the public body. A request for notice lapses 6 > months after it is made. The public body shall inform the requester of this > fact by enclosure with, notation upon or text included within the first > notice sent. The notice must be: > > (1) Delivered to the postal service used by the public body not > later than 9 a.m. of the third working day before the meeting for > transmittal to the requester by regular mail; or > > (2) If feasible for the public body and the requester has agreed > to receive the public notice by electronic mail, transmitted to the > requester by electronic mail sent not later than 9 a.m. of the third working > day before the meeting. > > > > My point here is very simple. When the same legislators wrote NRS 241 they > put in 9AM but when they wrote NRS 116 they did not write in 9AM. > > > > That is simply because the lawyers that run the CAI and write this > legislation don't want to have anything certain. The more wishy-washy the > law, the more you are confused and the more money the lawyers will make. I > know that is very simplistic. > > > > > > NRS 241.020 Meetings to be open and public; limitations on closure of > meetings; notice of meetings; copy of materials; exceptions. > > 2. Except in an emergency, written notice of all meetings must be > given at least 3 working days before the meeting. The notice must include: > > (a) The time, place and location of the meeting. > > (b) A list of the locations where the notice has been posted. > > (c) An agenda consisting of: > > Here are the meeting dates for the full of 2011 for these two public bodies. > NOW YOU SHOULD ASK but why the 9AM. THE ANSWER IS BECAUSE the agenda is > available with the notice. THE NOTICE MUST INCLUDE THE AGENDA. Our > agenda/notice is a disgrace. > > > > > > Now does public bodies push this law? READ this. > > > > APPRAISAL COMMISSION - 645C > > Date Agenda Regulation Location/Time Education > Deadline Minutes Jan 10 > <http://red.state.nv.us/Appraisal/Agenda/2011/2011-01-11_agenda_red.pdf> > Appraisal Review Committee Meeting Agenda 8:30 a.m. n/a March 1-3 > South February 7 June 7-9 South May 13 Aug 30-Sep 1 South August > 1 Nov 29-Dec 1 South November 1 > > <http://www.red.state.nv.us/meetings/meetings.htm#top> > > COMMISSION FOR COMMON-INTEREST COMMUNITIES & CONDOMINIUM HOTELS - > 116, 116A, 116B > > Date Agenda Regulation Location/Time Education > Deadline Minutes Feb 23-25 North Apr 26-28 South Jun 28-30 > North Oct 4 - 6 South Dec 6-8 South > > > > Robey
| Eileen Mckyton vegasbaba22  | 2:54 pm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment